Ahh, Innocent Blood
. During the early 1990’s, there was a slew of “mobster” movies made from ‘Goodfellas‘, to the third Godfather flick to even Stallone’s shark-jumping opus, ‘Oscar‘. In a way, Innocent Blood plays off this trend, but adds vampires to the mix. I’m not a big fan of vampire movies to be honest, for the same reason most people aren’t. Vampires are usually written as pretentious pretty assholes who suffer from severe cases of Mary Sue/Marty Stu syndromes. Fortunately, this movie, much like last week’s Blood: The Last Vampire is not the case. Now the movie is a black comedy, but what was funny about it is that it wasn’t advertised as such. People went to see the movie thinking it was a typical serious toned horror film, so some people wasn’t sure what to make of it. This plays into a theme I’ve often wondered: If you don’t tell someone that something is a comedy, will they know to laugh? Innocent Blood, was re-titled for international audiences as ‘A French Vampire in America‘, implying it’s a sequel to director John Landis’ earlier black comedy movie, ‘An American Werewolf in London‘. (Another charming film, but more well known, so there’s no need to talk about it.)
Innocent Blood is about a young beautiful Frenchwoman named Marie, played by the beautiful Anne Parillaud, who happens to be a vampire. It’s a classic theme that’s been brought up hundreds of times in comic books: “If I must kill, then let it be those who deserve it.” Essentially the city of Pittsburgh (where the story takes place) is in the midst of a mob war, and Marie decides to use it as a cover to feed on mobsters. She seduces the mobsters, and then they’re alone, “vamps out” on them. Then she covers her tracks with a shotgun blast to the face. (Also to make sure none of them turn into vampires.) Unfortunately, she attempts to feed off a mob boss by the name of Sal Macelli, played awesomely by Robert Loggia, and she gets interrupted before she can shot him, and thus the plot begins when he wakes up in a morgue with a thermometer in his stomach, and decided to start converting his gang. (Including Don Rickles. Srsly.)
Now let me stop for a moment here and tell you about these mobsters. They are every single Italian stereotype you have ever seen rolled up into a single movie. All the music they listen to is Frank Sinatra, they all wear Armani suits, and they eat nothing but the typical Italian foods like spaghetti and calzone. (Yes, there is a garlic and vampire joke involved in the film. Two actually.) It sort of hilarious in it’s generalizations. The vampires on the other hand, they’re played very straight laced. Super-speed, strength, flight, and even wall crawling abilities. But they also didn’t screw about with the weaknesses. Break their neck, they die. Shoot them in the head, they die. Expose them to sunlight, they die. No sparkling here. Of all the vampire movies I’ve ever seen, this one has my favorite ones. (I only wish they turned into bats.) It’s all straight forward and absolutely NO pretentiousness. It is SO unpretentious that in one scene, where Macelli is soaked in gasoline, the hero takes out a lighter… And Macelli doesn’t become afraid or trying to talk him down… He looks at him like “screw you and yo
ur punkass girlfriend!” It’s just this cocky machismo that is so appealing, especially in the wake of the Edwards of the world. The hero of the film is played by the guy who plays that dude on “Without a Trace”. I could look up the details, but I can’t care enough to remember the character’s name. He could be played by Urkel for all I care, he’s not the star of the movie. You’re watching this movie for two reasons: Anne Parillaud’s character and Robert Loggia’s character. Maire because of how beautiful she is, and Macelli because of how cocky-awesome he is.
As for the acting… Well, like I said, they’re all acting like stereotypes, so it does comes across a bit corny at times. None of the protagonists, other than Marie, is even memorable, and that’s probably because they played it too straight. The character of Marie is interesting, as she has that almost “innocent” quality about her. (Hence the title.) Not too much is revealed of her past, so she has that mysterious alluring quality to her. However, it’s a good thing she’s supposed to have a heavy French accent, because it barely covered up the fact that she can’t act. (But it does bring up the Luke Skywalker/Mark Hamill question: Acting badly or badly acting?) The special effects are nothing too fancy, especially for it’s time. There are two standout moments for me though. One is the eyes of the vampires are done in this multicolored kaleidoscope which looks really neat, and it’s an effect I’d like to seen done again today. Unfortunately, these were done in the older days pre-computer effects, so they were likely tinted sclera lens. (Which I’ve worn once, and feel sorry for anyone who ever has.) So sometimes, the pupils comes across as cross-eyed one time too many, making it look a little sillier than intended. And there’s this other scene, with a vampire being exposed to sunlight, and it’s a really impressive death scene that reminded me more of a charcoaling, than a typical “burn to flames” effect.
Innocent Blood is a silly film, but highly watchable. If you haven’t seen it, give it a try. It clocks in at about 110 minutes, so it’s not too long… And it’s a treat to see some vampires with an actual set of balls.
Join me next Thursday as I review an animated movie that inspired my generation to appreciate badly animated cartoon boobs, beheadings and… Taxi drivers?
